Designing for AI agents

Imagine a marketing manager opens their laptop on Monday morning and finds that an AI agent has already drafted the week’s campaign plan, scheduled posts across channels, and highlighted which customer segments need extra attention. 

No prompts were typed. No dashboards were clicked. The work was simply done. This is the new reality of autonomous AI agents. For designers, this moment introduces an entirely different canvas.

For the first time, digital systems are moving from tools that wait for instruction to autonomous actors that take initiative. They do not just follow commands but anticipate, decide, and sometimes act without direct prompts. 

This shift makes design more complex because it challenges long-held assumptions about interfaces, predictability, and control. The designer’s role expands from shaping interactions on a screen to orchestrating trust, accountability, and oversight in invisible systems, creating human-centered AI.

The urgency of this challenge is clear. PwC’s May 2025 AI agent survey indicates that 79% of senior executives report that their companies are already utilizing AI agents. Of those adopters, 66% report measurable productivity gains. 88% plan to increase AI budgets in the next 12 months.

These numbers reveal a world where autonomous agents are quickly becoming integral to how people work, learn, and make decisions. For designers, the question is not whether agents will enter mainstream use but how to ensure they do so in ways that remain trustworthy and human-centered.

AI design - Understanding AI agents through a product design lens 

AI agents have matured in stages, each one reshaping user expectations and raising new design challenges.

Chatbots (2000s) handled scripted interactions for customer service. By 2020 they powered 85 percent of such exchanges (Juniper Research). They proved automation could scale, but also revealed how frustrating rigid design can feel.

AI Assistants (2010s) like Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant brought natural language into daily life. With over 200 million active users by 2020, they shifted design focus to tone, personality, and error recovery.

AI Copilots (late 2010s–present) embedded intelligence into workflows. GitHub Copilot reached a million developers in six months. This era taught designers to integrate agents into specialized, high-stakes contexts where accuracy matters as much as usability.

Multimodal agents (2020s–present) now combine text, voice, image, and video while building memory over time. For designers, the challenge is not only interface polish but ensuring trust and continuity as agents operate across platforms and contexts.

The designer’s guide to AI agents

From commands to goals: Designing transparent autonomy

Designers should shift from designing for inputs to designing for outcomes. Instead of expecting users to issue explicit commands, AI agents should anticipate and pursue goals on behalf of the user. This requires designing for transparency of process, so users not only see results but also understand how and why those results were generated.

A practical playbook for designers includes:

• Clarify intent: Create experiences where users can state high-level goals (“Summarize key risks from our contracts”) rather than issue task-level commands.
  
• Make autonomy legible: Provide clear indicators of what the agent is doing in the background, so users feel in control even when the system is proactive.
  
• Design interventions: Build intuitive ways for users to step in, adjust course, or override decisions without friction.
  

This shift positions AI agents as goal-seeking collaborators rather than reactive tools, elevating the designer’s role to one of making autonomy trustworthy and accountable.

From interactions to relationships: Designing with memory and trust

AI agents are evolving into long-term collaborators that grow alongside the user. Designers need to intentionally shape how memory, context, and personalization build meaningful continuity between user and agent.

A practical playbook for designers includes:

• Design with memory as a material: Decide what the agent should remember, for how long, and how to make that memory visible to the user.
  
• Balance personalization with boundaries: Ensure continuity builds trust without crossing into creepiness or overreach.
  
• Evolve trust over time: Treat every interaction as part of a relationship arc, where reliability and consistency deepen user confidence.
  

By framing agents as adaptive partners, designers move beyond session-based UX and begin crafting experiences where trust compounds, making the agent a dependable part of the user’s workflow and decision-making.

From tools to ecosystems: Orchestrating workflows seamlessly

AI agents thrive when they are not siloed but serve as orchestrators across platforms, data sources, and workflows. The design challenge is about shaping the connective tissue that makes fragmented systems feel seamless.

A practical playbook for designers includes:

• Design for orchestration: Ensure agents can weave together APIs, platforms, and services into a unified flow without overwhelming the user.
  
• Prioritize context continuity: Maintain a coherent sense of “state” as users move across tools, so the agent feels like a single presence rather than a patchwork of integrations.
  
• Make the invisible visible: Provide lightweight cues that show how and where the agent is acting across the ecosystem, balancing convenience with awareness.
  

By treating the ecosystem as the true design canvas, designers enable agents to function as integrators of experience, not just tools within it, creating a world where work happens seamlessly across boundaries.

From updates to adaptation: Designing explainable AI learning

AI agents don’t wait for version releases. They evolve continuously, learning from user behavior and refining outputs in real time. For designers, the challenge is not the adaptation itself, but making that evolution visible, understandable, and trustworthy.

A practical playbook for designers includes:

• Surface learning arcs: Show how the agent improves over time so users feel supported rather than second-guessed.
  
• Balance adaptability with predictability: Allow the system to evolve, but give users a clear sense of what has changed and why.
  
• Embed feedback loops: Design simple, intuitive ways for users to reinforce or correct the agent’s behavior without breaking flow.
  

When adaptation becomes transparent, users experience agents not as black boxes that shift unpredictably, but as reliable collaborators that grow alongside them.

AI agents and the future of product design 

The future of product design is unfolding in real time. Yet for most product teams, the challenge is working through the practical roadblocks of designing and deploying them today. Designing for agents means grappling with uncertainty, invisible decision-making, and the delicate balance between autonomy and oversight.

Product designers often face three recurring pain points: unclear agent roles, fragile user trust, and poor integration into existing workflows. 

These aren’t abstract issues but day-to-day blockers that determine whether AI features are adopted or abandoned. The path forward requires acknowledging these realities while laying the foundation for future-proof design.

A practical playbook for product teams includes:

• Clarify the agent’s role early: Misaligned expectations are a major source of friction. Before building interfaces, define whether the agent is a helper, a collaborator, or an orchestrator. This clarity shapes not only design choices but also how much trust users are likely to extend.
  
• Design for trust checkpoints: Autonomy without visibility breeds anxiety. Introduce intentional moments where the agent explains its reasoning, previews potential outcomes, or asks for confirmation. These touchpoints make the system’s intelligence legible and give users confidence to delegate more over time.

• Balance autonomy with override: Agents are most powerful when they can act independently, but users must always feel they can step in. Offer simple, intuitive controls that let people adjust how much authority the agent has based on the stakes of the task.
  
• Embed AI into existing workflows: New, standalone panels often create resistance. The most effective agents operate as invisible layers within familiar tools, surfacing insights, catching errors, and nudging decisions exactly when needed.

Industry-specific AI agent design considerations

Regulated environments

Deloitte’s 2024 State of AI framework reports that regulation and risk are the biggest barriers to adoption.

In finance, healthcare, and law, agents do not simply enhance productivity. They carry compliance obligations. A robo-advisor must not only recommend portfolios but also explain the reasoning in language regulators can audit. A healthcare diagnostic agent must surface medical history without introducing bias or obscurity. 

A legal review agent cannot bury risks inside black-box outputs. Designers here face a paradox: the more autonomous the system, the greater the need for transparency. This requires explainable interfaces where every decision trail is visible. 

Designing for stakes: Safety vs. speed

Not all agents demand the same level of oversight. A shopping assistant can misinterpret intent with minimal fallout. A medical scheduling agent that misallocates appointments could risk patient safety. This spectrum means design cannot be one-size-fits-all.
In high-stakes environments, interfaces must slow down action, requiring checkpoints and confirmations. In low-stakes environments, friction should be minimized to maintain delight. 

Research from Stanford HAI shows that users calibrate trust differently depending on domain, forgiving errors in casual contexts but punishing them harshly in professional or life-critical settings. Designers must tune autonomy to the stakes of the domain, ensuring the balance between speed and assurance feels natural.

Aligning AI tone with brand & culture

The personality of an agent is not universal. A playful, informal tone may be welcome in a consumer shopping app, but inappropriate in enterprise legal software. B2B environments often require a more neutral, professional voice, while consumer apps thrive on relatability and emotional connection. In some markets, cultural expectations around hierarchy, formality, and politeness will also influence how agents should behave.
Slack’s 2025 survey on AI design adoption in enterprises showed that “tone mismatch” was a reason employees rejected AI design features. Designers must therefore treat personality as a strategic layer, not an afterthought. The agent’s character is part of the user experience. It signals whether the system aligns with the culture of the team, the sector, or even the geography.

Conclusion: Leading the transformation

Designing for AI agents is not a matter of adding new features. It is the redesign of how people relate to technology itself, making AI-human centered. Interfaces that once captured clicks and taps must now negotiate trust, context, and decision-making. 

Designers are shaping the behavior of systems that act with autonomy, learn over time, and operate across industries where the stakes range from convenience to compliance.

The opportunity is enormous. The designer’s new role is that of a behavior architect, balancing automation with human agency, making autonomy transparent, and ensuring that every interaction reinforces confidence rather than erodes it.

The organizations that master this will not only build more intelligent products. They will build more human ones.

Partner with us to design intelligent, human-centered agents that redefine how users interact with products.